Skip to content

Sarah Davis

Sarah Davis, born July 22, 1959, was a Black American registered nurse in Pasadena, California. She and her husband, police officer Marcus Davis, raised their son, Andrew “Andy” Davis. Sarah used her nursing knowledge in long-term educational, communication, mobility, and medical advocacy for Andy.

Early Life and Background

Sarah was born in California and grew up wanting to help people. She was intelligent, driven, and serious about her future. Nursing appealed to her as stable, meaningful work in which she could care directly for others. She and Marcus met in the Los Angeles area and fell in love as teenagers. Their early connection included intellectual compatibility, shared values, plans for their futures, and the wish to have a family.

Andy was born on October 8, 1977, when Sarah was eighteen and Marcus was nineteen. Neonatal Group B streptococcal meningitis caused the neurological injury that resulted in cerebral palsy and extensive support needs. Sarah and Marcus refused recommendations to institutionalize him and raised him at home. Sarah’s immediate concern was practical: “Okay. What does he need? How do we help him?” She learned his early care before she had completed nursing school; becoming his mother and developing her profession overlapped rather than following an already established nursing career.

Sarah’s father had more than forty years of construction experience. When Andy was about fourteen and the family moved into a new house, he helped Marcus install weight-bearing handholds around the rooms. The supports were disguised as decorative trim, coat hooks, and strategically placed furniture so that Andy could use the house without its looking institutional.

Education

Sarah trained as a nurse in the late 1970s and early 1980s. Her education gave her medical vocabulary, clinical knowledge, and an understanding of hospital procedures. She also studied Andy’s conditions and learned the details of his individual needs through daily care. Formal training supplemented her knowledge of her son without replacing it.

Ellen Matsuda helped Sarah learn special-education law, IEP procedures, relevant regulations, and the language administrators used when making decisions about services. Sarah learned to assemble records, cite specific obligations, and present a case in terms an institution could not easily evade. Her experience also taught her that accurate documentation and professional credentials did not guarantee a hearing, particularly when she was being dismissed as a Black mother.

Teaching Andy and Cody Matsuda expanded Sarah’s understanding of education. She learned to build demanding lessons around accessible materials, discussion, and rest instead of treating conventional classroom methods as a measure of ability. Leaving an institution that was harming Andy became a legitimate form of advocacy to her, although accepting that decision required her to confront how long she had continued trying to make the school serve him.

Nursing Career

Sarah worked in hospitals and clinics as a registered nurse while raising Andy. She cared closely for her patients and developed practical knowledge of the medical systems in which she worked. Her professional experience helped her identify dangerous changes in Andy’s condition, communicate with clinicians, challenge dismissal, and coordinate care across specialties.

She worked full-time before the 1995 homeschool transition. When she and Marcus withdrew Andy from Pasadena High School, she reduced her paid work to part-time and per-diem nursing so that she could teach and coordinate his care during the week. The change cost income and limited her career advancement. Marcus continued full-time police work, providing the financial stability and benefits on which the family depended. Sarah did not regret reducing her nursing hours to secure an education that worked for her son.

Personality

Sarah was naturally warm and approachable, with the practiced calm of a nurse accustomed to helping people through difficult situations. When someone dismissed or endangered Andy, her manner became cold and exact. Anger made each word more deliberate rather than louder. She could confront a doctor, insurer, or school administrator while remaining controlled enough to name the precise failure and insist on a response.

She processed stress through action. During a crisis, she assessed Andy’s condition, organized care, documented changes, and determined whom to contact next. Advocacy gave her a use for anger that otherwise had nowhere to go. Beneath her professional composure, she carried accumulated fury at the schools that had underestimated Andy, the clinicians who had ignored his symptoms, and the testing staff who treated his achievement as suspicious. That anger coexisted with affection and an ability to enjoy his happiness.

Years of paid work, caregiving, teaching, and institutional battles left Sarah deeply exhausted. She rarely complained, but the fatigue persisted even when an immediate crisis had passed. She carried particular guilt about Room 118, questioning why she had not withdrawn Andy sooner and fearing that the school had caused harm she could not repair. Learning to forgive herself did not mean deciding that those years no longer mattered. She redirected guilt into providing a different education and helping other families recognize similar failures.

Her fears were specific: Andy dying during a seizure, another medical emergency going untreated, his pain being dismissed, and his competence or humanity being questioned again. She worried about who would advocate for him when she was no longer there. Knowledge of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy, or SUDEP, could keep her awake checking whether he was breathing. Clinical experience did not protect her from a mother’s fear of losing him.

Watching Andy thrive sustained her. His literary analysis, college work, relationship with Cody, and eventual advocacy gave her hope that he could have the life he wanted. She wanted more than individual victories for her own family; she wanted other Black disabled families to have language, support, and practical means to challenge the same treatment. Her confidence and advocacy skills grew without making the work effortless or eliminating her fear.

Cultural Identity and Heritage

Sarah’s experience as a Black mother and nurse shaped how she understood institutions. Racism and ableism were intertwined in the treatment of her son: his physical and speech disabilities were used to discount his intelligence, while racial assumptions affected whether his pain and her observations were believed. She knew the work of continually demonstrating credibility despite already holding professional qualifications.

The difference between her reception and Ellen’s became particularly explicit during Andy’s 1997 baclofen-toxicity crisis. Sarah arrived with clinical observations, a medication history, and a clear explanation of the danger, yet staff treated her as an anxious mother. Ellen’s arrival as a white state disability-rights official changed their response within minutes. Sarah called Ellen because she understood that difference in institutional power; using it to obtain care did not make the injustice less enraging.

Sarah also objected to praise that treated a Black disabled child’s intelligence as an improbable exception. The surprise surrounding Andy’s CHSPE results was part of what she challenged, not a compliment she accepted. Her writing connected that experience to other Black families’ struggles with presumed incompetence. In friendships and advocacy networks, she found mutual understanding with parents whose children encountered both racial and disability discrimination.

Speech and Communication Patterns

Sarah’s usual voice was warm, measured, and professional. Her nursing manner could reassure a patient or organize a difficult situation without becoming impersonal. In advocacy, she used medical terminology, regulations, and precise accounts of events strategically. Her cold “Process his registration” left the CHSPE registrar no conversational opening for another diversion into alternative programs.

With Andy, she waited for him to finish speaking and did not finish his sentences for him. His stutter did not change the seriousness with which she listened. She asked questions that centered his choices and distinguished a reflexive reassurance from what he was actually experiencing. “How are you really doing, baby?” invited him to describe fear as well as physical symptoms. When she could not promise an outcome, she admitted it rather than offering certainty she did not have.

Her warmth included gentle humor. When Andy said he felt awful during the aftermath of Cody’s suicide attempt, she asked whether it was “Specific crap, or just general crap?” With Ellen, shared worry could give way to delighted, giggling conversation about their sons. With Marcus, Sarah was affectionate and direct; she expected him to examine an assumption when she challenged it, while allowing him the time he needed to process it. Her published writing named racism and ableism plainly and described experiences other families could recognize.

Relationship to Her Body

Sarah experienced caregiving and advocacy as sustained physical exhaustion as well as emotional responsibility. She could function with professional composure while badly needing sleep herself. During Andy’s crises, checking his breathing and remaining available through the night took precedence over her own rest. She and Marcus depended on each other to take over when one of them was depleted.

Her controlled voice did not mean her body was unaffected by fear. During the 1997 emergency, her hands shook while she explained Andy’s worsening condition to staff who were not listening. She continued presenting the medical details even as her son’s breathing and consciousness deteriorated.

Physical Characteristics

Tiredness was often visible in Sarah’s face despite her composed manner. During the aftermath of Cody’s suicide attempt, she had dark circles beneath her eyes while helping Andy through his own exhaustion. Her presence remained warm and approachable in ordinary interaction.

Personal Style and Presentation

Sarah maintained a professional presentation in clinical and institutional settings. When advocating, she sat close to Andy, sometimes keeping a hand on his shoulder or wheelchair, and maintained direct eye contact with the person she was addressing. Her protective posture and deliberate speech made her anger apparent without a raised voice. When both parents attended a meeting, their proximity to Andy also communicated that they supported him together.

Tastes and Preferences

Intellectual engagement was a source of satisfaction for Sarah, particularly in the literature discussions she taught. Hearing Andy and Cody analyze demanding books gave her the pleasure of the work itself as well as relief that they finally had room to demonstrate their abilities. She valued doing what was necessary for Andy more than protecting her own career trajectory, although nursing and caregiving left limited time and energy for personal pleasures.

She enjoyed the ordinary happiness of watching her son fall in love. Discovering that Andy and Cody had stayed connected by telephone while asleep prompted delighted laughter with Ellen, not another evaluation of their support needs. Sarah welcomed occasions when the boys could simply be teenagers who did not want to say good night.

Habits, Routines, and Daily Life

Sarah balanced nursing shifts with appointments, therapy, school meetings, medication management, and household needs. During the homeschool years, teaching and lesson preparation joined those responsibilities. She kept detailed records of symptoms, appointments, educational progress, and institutional responses. Preparation and documentation were routine work, not measures reserved for the moment an argument began.

At home, she helped Andy with transfers, recognized changes in his stutter and muscle tension, and distinguished withdrawal from the silence of conserving energy. Care could mean sitting beside his bed at two in the morning with a basin, helping him through painful spasms, or making room for him to rest without shame. Warm baths, lavender, Epsom salts, medication, and subsequent rest formed part of his established spasticity-care routine; the bath’s heat and sensory comfort were distinct from medication treatment.

She kept Epsom salts and lavender oil stocked, bought the oil in bulk, refilled Andy’s diffuser, and replaced it when it broke. Equipment, a charged AAC device, and accessible recorded material were incorporated into home life. She also brought familiar comfort food, including a Big Mac and chocolate shake, without requiring Andy to justify wanting it. Practical care remained affectionate rather than a performance of sacrifice for which he owed her gratitude.

Advocacy for Andy

Main article: Sarah Davis and Andy Davis

Sarah coordinated Andy’s early care and fought for services, equipment, hearing care, and an education that recognized his intelligence. Much of his segregated schooling took place at Riverside School for Exceptional Children. When he entered Pasadena High in 1994, he was placed primarily in Room 118 until his withdrawal in fall 1995. Picture books and low-expectation assignments bore little relationship to the books he was listening to independently. Sarah brought home library audiobooks, although she did not initially understand the full extent of the education he was building through them.

By fall 1995, school stress and inadequate care had become intolerable. Andy had four seizures in one week; after one seizure, staff left him unconscious and sitting in urine for hours. Sarah and Marcus removed him from Pasadena High. The decision was one of the hardest Sarah had made because she had fought to secure a place in a mainstream school and had continued hoping it could be made to work.

Sarah helped establish the Matsuda-Davis Homeschool Cooperative with Ellen, Greg Matsuda, and Marcus for Andy and Cody. From fall 1995 through spring 1997, lessons alternated between the Davis and Matsuda homes four days a week, with flexible Fridays. Sarah taught English, literature, and creative writing, using accessible reading formats and academically demanding material rather than the picture-book curriculum Andy’s school had assigned him. Reading aloud and recorded lessons built on his listening skills. Discussions of To Kill a Mockingbird, 1984, and The Crucible let both boys demonstrate analytical abilities that their schools had failed to recognize.

The cooperative provided accessible materials and academically appropriate work for both boys, including a mandatory midday rest period, flexible pacing, audio recordings for Andy, and typing, AAC, and ASL for Cody. In 1997, Andy passed the California High School Proficiency Examination, scoring in the eighty-fifth percentile overall and the ninety-second percentile in English. His scores were reviewed after testing staff treated the result as unexpected.

Sarah expected Andy to pass the examination because she knew his work. At registration, she refused attempts to redirect him into alternative programs. The review of his high scores brought pride in his achievement and anger that he was still being required to prove what she already knew. She called the testing center and explicitly challenged the racial and ableist assumptions behind the review.

Sarah continued advocating for Andy’s medical care and access as he attended Pasadena City College from 1997 through 2000 and then California State University, Northridge. She had documented loud snoring and other sleep symptoms for years before severe obstructive sleep apnea was recognized in 2002 or 2003. Recognition brought relief and grief together: the symptoms were finally being addressed, but the years of lost rest could not be returned to him.

Medical Crises

After Cody’s spring 1995 suicide attempt, Sarah supported Andy through increased seizures, postictal exhaustion, anxiety, and fear that Cody would die. Marcus helped arrange and support Andy’s ICU visit. At home, Sarah monitored his symptoms, managed medication timing, and admitted that she did not know what would happen to Cody. She made clear that loving him did not make Andy responsible for keeping him alive.

On the Saturday after the visit, Andy was stiff and hurting after almost nineteen hours in bed. Sarah helped him sit up slowly, supported him with pillows, checked for fever, and discussed when his next medication was due. She offered chicken broth and crackers. When he was too nauseated and exhausted to want food, she suspected that his blood sugar had fallen after so long without eating and urged him to try crackers and water. She also held him while he cried, taking care not to hurt his back. Her practical attention did not prevent her from acknowledging that she was frightened too.

Following Andy’s worsening health during summer 1997, a later increase in his baclofen prescription was followed by dangerous sedation, vomiting, and respiratory depression. Sarah documented his decline, repeatedly called his neurologist’s office, and sought emergency care when he continued deteriorating. She told staff that she suspected baclofen toxicity and needed immediate intervention. They dismissed her despite her nursing credentials and left Andy waiting for more than an hour.

Sarah called Ellen, whose state identification and intervention secured an examination within five minutes of her arrival. Testing confirmed baclofen toxicity, and Andy spent three to four days in intensive care. Sarah insisted on documentation that she had reported the symptoms and been told to wait. The experience intensified her distrust of medical deference: afterward, she brought witnesses, retained detailed records, and sought state-level help when necessary rather than assuming professional courtesy would ensure appropriate care.

Writing and Public Advocacy

Sarah extended her family advocacy through writing and conference work for other Black disabled families. In 1998, she published When My Black Disabled Son “Surprised” Everyone, an essay about the racism and ableism surrounding Andy’s CHSPE registration, the review of his high scores, and the treatment of his intelligence as an unexpected exception.

In 1999, she published Teaching My Son Taught Me He Was Never Broken. The essay described Andy’s time in Room 118, his work in the homeschool cooperative, and Sarah’s realization that the school system—not her son’s mind—had been the barrier to his education. Her later advocacy continued to address educational segregation, presumed incompetence, and medical dismissal at the intersection of race and disability.

She mentored families navigating similar disputes and shared the institutional language, documentation methods, and practical lessons she had learned. She wanted parents to trust observations that professionals had dismissed and to know that they were not alone. Her work sought changes beyond a single accommodation for Andy, while remaining grounded in the experiences of their family.

Personal Philosophy

Sarah believed Andy’s support needs required accommodation, not pity or lowered expectations. Education should challenge him while providing the access that made participation possible. Rest, flexible pacing, and accessible material enabled learning; they were not evidence that he could not do the work. Homeschooling became a choice for his wellbeing and education rather than an admission of defeat.

She believed disabled people deserved love, romance, independence, and joy as well as adequate care. Protecting Andy did not entitle either parent to decide that his feelings were unreal or too complicated for him to understand. She wanted him to be believed about his own heart, including when his parents feared how the world might treat a Black disabled boy who loved another boy.

Her approach to institutions combined preparation with an unwillingness to wait indefinitely for permission to protect her son. She documented events, learned the applicable rules, and challenged decisions directly. Credentials could help without erasing racism. When continued negotiation was harming Andy, leaving the institution or bringing in outside authority could be necessary. She remained willing to sacrifice advancement and income for his wellbeing without regretting those choices.

Family and Core Relationships

Andy Davis

Andy was central to Sarah’s life, and their bond combined close bodily knowledge with respect for his mind and choices. His “Mama” could be a request for help, a frightened check-in, or an appeal for comfort. She listened for changes in his speech and silence without treating them as a measure of intelligence. As he grew older, she asked for his assessment of his body and his input into care.

Sarah recognized Andy’s romantic love for Cody in spring 1995. On the Friday night after Andy’s ICU visit, she defended his understanding when Marcus questioned whether their son might be confusing gratitude or friendship with romantic love. She reminded Marcus of their own teenage relationship and argued that fear for Andy’s safety did not make his feelings less real. Later that night, hearing Andy speak lovingly to Cody in his sleep deepened her hope that his feelings would be returned.

When Andy and Cody began dating in summer 1995, Sarah welcomed their relationship without homophobia or an objection to two disabled boys being together. After they fell asleep during a call and remained connected for eleven to twelve hours, she and Ellen shared the discovery on their kitchen phones, laughing like teenagers themselves. They let the boys sleep rather than ending the connection. Sarah was delighted that Andy had someone who understood him and relieved that ordinary happiness was possible after nearly losing Cody.

Their closeness continued into Andy’s adult life with Cody. He still called Sarah when he was ill or needed reassurance, and she remained available with familiar, practical care. His growing independence did not require him to stop needing his mother or to conceal exhaustion from her.

Ellen Matsuda

Ellen was Sarah’s friend, fellow parent, and co-educator. Her knowledge of disability services helped Sarah navigate IEPs, identify resources, and respond when administrators minimized her concerns. Sarah brought direct experience of anti-Black racism that Ellen did not encounter in the same way as a white mother. They learned from each other rather than treating their experiences as interchangeable.

The homeschool cooperative deepened their partnership as they watched both sons succeed with appropriate support. During the baclofen crisis, Ellen used institutional authority to obtain care after Sarah had been ignored. Their friendship also included pleasure and relief, particularly the delighted telephone conversation about Andy and Cody. Their sons’ relationship added another family connection to years of shared work and mutual help.

Greg Matsuda

Sarah respected Greg’s educational-psychology expertise and his precise, structured teaching. In the cooperative, she saw how his approach helped Andy and Cody, both autistic, access demanding work. They shared high expectations for the boys while recognizing that effective teaching required appropriate structure and accommodations.

Romantic and Significant Relationships

Marcus Davis

Main article: Sarah Davis and Marcus Davis

Sarah and Marcus married around 1977–1978 and built their careers while raising Andy. Their partnership depended on mutual trust, shared values, and a willingness to divide work without keeping score. Sarah led much of the medical and educational coordination; Marcus provided financial stability, physical and emotional support, and advocacy alongside her. He trusted her clinical judgment and asked for guidance when Andy’s needs exceeded his own emergency training.

Their different emotional rhythms sometimes required adjustment. Sarah could identify and name a problem before Marcus had worked through it. She challenged him directly when he doubted Andy’s understanding of love, but trusted his willingness to reconsider. They presented a united front in institutional encounters while retaining room for disagreement, correction, and forgiveness at home. Marcus could offer practical help without demanding that Sarah explain or soften her anger first; she took over when he needed rest.

Sarah also lived with the contradiction of relying on police income and insurance while fearing what another officer might do to her son. Watching Marcus rehearse police-encounter scripts with Andy made that danger immediate. His badge could not guarantee Andy’s safety or erase the racism either parent encountered in other institutions. Their later public advocacy did not remove the financial and professional risks they had carried.

Their marriage ended when Marcus died from a heart attack at age seventy-five in March 2033. He had lived to see Andy’s education, adult partnership, and public advocacy. Sarah survived the partner whose steadiness and willingness to share responsibility had sustained their family through more than fifty-five years of parenthood.

Legacy and Memory

Sarah wanted to be remembered for believing in Andy and acting on that belief: refusing institutionalization, challenging the judgments made about his intelligence, and changing their lives when his school continued harming him. Co-teaching an education that allowed Andy and Cody to thrive, expecting Andy to pass the CHSPE, and challenging the suspicion directed at his results were part of the example she hoped to leave.

She wanted her two essays to continue circulating among Black disabled families and to be used in training about the intersection of racism and ableism. Her hope was that parents would recognize their experiences, trust their observations, and find practical ways to obtain support. She also wanted her acceptance of Andy and Cody to demonstrate that disabled young people deserved romance and the ordinary experiences of growing up.

Watching Andy build his own life gave Sarah a sense of vindication without undoing what he had endured. She wanted her persistence, willingness to change course, and lack of regret about protecting him to remain part of how her work was remembered. His later achievements mattered to her as the life of the son she loved, not merely evidence that an argument with a school had been won.

Memorable Quotes

“Process his registration.”

Sarah addressed the CHSPE registrar who questioned whether Andy should take the examination and suggested alternative programs.

“You meant you didn’t think a disabled Black kid could score in the 85th percentile. You reviewed his test because you couldn’t believe he was that smart.”

Sarah addressed a testing-center representative after Andy’s scores were flagged for review.

“Andy and Cody discuss To Kill a Mockingbird at a level that would impress college professors. They debate 1984. They write essays about The Crucible and disability rights. The school was wrong. Room 118 was WRONG. Andy wasn’t the problem. The system was.”

Sarah described the boys’ work in her 1999 essay, Teaching My Son Taught Me He Was Never Broken.

“You’re going to pass. You know the material.”

Sarah reassured Andy before the CHSPE without lowering her expectations of him.

“How are you really doing, baby?”

Sarah asked Andy about his emotional state during the aftermath of Cody’s suicide attempt.

“You are not responsible for keeping Cody alive. That’s not your job.”

Sarah distinguished Andy’s love for Cody from responsibility for his survival.

“I know, baby. Me too.”

Sarah acknowledged that she shared Andy’s fear for Cody.

“I hope he loves you back too, baby. I really, really do.”

Sarah expressed her hope while checking on Andy as he slept and spoke about Cody.

“Marcus. Stop. Yes. He understands.”

Sarah defended Andy’s understanding of his own romantic feelings when Marcus questioned it.